Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28229 (PNJ)

SANTOSH AND ANR v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/10027/2025 · 2025-05-22

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

222 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10027-2025 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 22.05.2025 SANTOSH AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS V/S STATE OF HARYANA ... RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ Present: Mr. Sumit Chahal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. * * * RAJESH BHARDWAJ , J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners in case FIR No.225 dated 10.06.2023, registered under Sections 323, 324, 325, 34 IPC (Sections 201, 302 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act, 1959 added later on), at Police Station Hansi Sadar, Hansi. Vide order dated 20.02.2025, while granting interim protection, the petitioners were directed to appear before the trial Court within a period of 10 days. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that pursuant to order dated 20.02.2025, petitioners have appeared before the trial Court and as such, their interim bail may be made absolute. Learned State counsel affirmed the fact that the petitioners have appeared before the trial Court. In view of the above, interim order dated 20.02.2025 is made absolute subject to compliance of conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. Petition stands allowed. 22.05.2025 (RAJESH BHARDWAJ) Janki JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No JANKI BHATT 2025.05.26 11:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh