APHC010400342019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19190/2019 Between: 1. G SARATH REDDY, S/O G VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR , R/O PLOT NO. C 4, HARSHAA CLASSIC, NEAR AMALODABHAVI SCHOOL, ASHOK NAGAR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 86 URBAN DEVELOPMENT (M) DEPARTMENT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH 2. THE ELURU MUNCIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 19190/2019 G SARATH REDDY, S/O G VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR , R/O PLOT NO. C 4, HARSHAA CLASSIC, NEAR AMALODABHAVI SCHOOL, ASHOK NAGAR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 86 URBAN DEVELOPMENT (M) DEPARTMENT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THE ELURU MUNCIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] G SARATH REDDY, S/O G VENKATA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC CIVIL CONTRACTOR , R/O PLOT NO. C 4, HARSHAA CLASSIC, NEAR AMALODABHAVI SCHOOL, ASHOK NAGAR, ...PETITIONER REP.BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 86 URBAN DEVELOPMENT (M) DEPARTMENT, AT VELAGAPUDI, THE ELURU MUNCIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 14.07.2025 PNS