2025:UHC:1222 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 313 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mrs. Manju Bahuguna, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mrs. Rangoli Purohit, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant “Sukhvinder Singh @ Sakkhi” is seeking bail in relation to case crime no. 231 of 2024 P.S. Dineshpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein, the present applicant has been chargesheeeted for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(2), 351(2), 352 of BNS, 2023 r/w Section 3/25 of Arms Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and he has not been previously convicted. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that in the said case crime the chargesheet has already been filed and as such there is no need of the applicant for custodial interrogation and he is languishing in jail since 28.01.2024. 6. Per contra, learned Brief Holder for the State vehemently opposed the bail application by submitting that the applicant have a great criminal history and he is the accused in more than 12 cases and most of them are of the same nature. 7. Apart from this, she submits that in the said incident there are four injured persons namely Balram @ Golu, Gurdeep Singh @ Laadi, Pushpraj Singh @ Prince and Satyendra, to whom the gunshot injury was caused by the applicant and other co-accused persons. 8. She submits that taking into consideration the long criminal history of the applicant there may be a possibility that he may influence the investigation since it appears from the allegations of the FIR and the charge-sheet that the applicant and his associates committed organized crime, which is nothing but it appears to be spreading terror in the society. 2025:UHC:1222 9. After hearing the arguments at length and after gone through the FIR and the charge sheet, this court is of the view that the applicant does not deserve for bail. 10. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is rejected. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 20.02.2025 PR 2025:UHC:1222