Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28219 (ALL)

SAKET KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/7174/2025 · 2025-03-10

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35787 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7174 of 2025 Petitioner :- Saket Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sridhar Tripathi, learned standing counsel for the state-respondents and Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent-gram panchayat. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner over arazi and gata no.111/5, situated in mauza and Tehsil Kalampur (Harpur), Jamaniya, Ghazipur which is the bhoomidhari land and also direct the District Magistrate to direct the concern authorities of Tehsil Jamania, District Ghazipur to maintain status quo till the disposal of the claim of the petitioner." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is Bhumidhar of plot no.111/5, area 0.023 hect., situated in Mauja Kalanpur, Tehsil Jamania, District Ghazipur. He further submitted that the authorities are disturbing the possession of the petitioner and trying to raise construction in the bhoomidhari plot no.111/5, as such, the authorities should be restrained from interferring in the possession of the petitioner and to maintain status quo in respect to the plot in question. 4. Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent-gram panchayat placed the instruction dated 11.3.2025 sent by the Gram Panchayat concerned which is taken on record. He submitted that it is admitted that the petitioner is the co-tenure holder of plot no.111/5, area 0.0230 hect. and the petitioner's residential house is existing over the same. He further submitted that in respect to plot no.111/5, area 0.0230 hect., petitioner along with 19 others are recorded and are in possession over the same. He further submitted that construction of panchayat bhawan and toilet is not going on over the petitioner's plot no.111/5 rather the construction is going on over plot no.111/2, area 0.028 hect which is different from the petitioner's plot no.111/5. He also submitted that the instant petition has been filed with malafide intention as mentioned in paragraph no.6 of the petition, as such, the instant writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 5. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 6. There is no dispute about the fact that petitioner is the co-tenure holder of plot no.111/5, area 0.0230 hect. and the gram panchayat is raising construction of panchayat bhawan and toilet over plot no.111/2. 7. The instruction sent by the gram panchayat concerned will be relevant for perusal which is as under:- ममनननय उचच नयमयमलय इलमहमबमद कक समक लममबत यमचचकम ससखयम 7174/2025 समकक त कक ममर बनमम उतर पदकश एव अनय मम चनमनलललखत तथयमतमक आखयम पसतकत हह। 1. यह चक यमचन आ०स० 111/5 रकबम 0.0230 हककटकयर हह कम सहखमतकदमर हह तथम अपनम ररहमयशन मकमन बनवमकर रह रहम हह। 2. यह चक आधमर वशर 1359 फसलन मम आ० ससखयम 111 कम कक ल रकबम 0.528 हककटकयर हह तथम वतरममन खततनन खमतम ससखयम 153 मम गमटम ससखयम 111/1 रकबम 0.139 हककटकयर व गमटम ससखयम 111/5 रकबम 0.023 हककटकयर कक ल ककतफल 0.162 हककटकयर रमम लसह कक नमम दरर हह। 3. यह चक खमतम स० 209 मम गमटम ससखयम 111/2 रकबम 0.028 हककटकयर सकदशरन पकत चचकक रन कक नमम अससकमररय भभचमधर कक रप मक दरर तथम खमतम ससखयम 343 गमटम ससखयम 111/2 रकबम 0.085 हककटकयर रमहछवर (रमसतम) कक रप मम दरर हह तथम खमतम ससखयम 1421 गमटम ससखयम 1/3 रकबम 0.126 हककटकयर आबमदन कक रप मम दरर हह इसकक अचतररक गमटम ससखयम102 रकबम 0.127 हककटकयर मतरक हह। रज 1360 फसलन कक खमतम ससखयम 206 हमलसयम सडक कक नमम दरर हह। 4. यह चक आरमरन ससखयम 115/5 रकबम 0.023 हककटकयर मम यमचन सचहत 19 अनय सहखमतकदमरज कम नमम वतरममन खततनन मक दरर हह रज अपनक- अपनक चहससक मम कचबर हह। 5. यह चक यमचन कक भभचम पर पसचमयत भवन तथम शतचमलय कम चनममरर नहन करमयम रम रहम हह। गमटम ससखयम 111/2 रकबम 0.028 हककटकयर पर पसचमयत भवन तथम शतचमलय बनमयम रम रहम हह रज यमचन कक आरमरन सक चभन हह। 6. यह चक यमचन कसबम रममचनयम गमरनपकर मम सवममन चववककमननद चडलरटल लमईबरकरन ससचमललत करतम हह तथम वरर 2015 मम वतरममन गमम पधमन कक चवरद पसचमयत चकनमव लडम गयम, चकनमव मम परमलरत हजनक कक पशचमत गमम पसचमयत मम हजनक वमलक पतयकक कमयर कम चवरजध करतम हह तथम झभठक चशकमयतन पमथरनम पत दककर कमयर मम बमधम पहहहचमतम हह। 7. यह चक यमचन दमरम इस यमचचकम मक सहन तथयज कम उलमख नहन चकयम गयम हह अतत यह यमचचकम खमररर हजनक यजगय हह। चदनमसक- 11.03.2025 भवदनय हसतमकर अपठननय लललतम पसमद ( गमम पधमन) गमम पसचमयत- कमलमपकर चवकमस खसड - रममचनयम रनपद- गमरनपकर 8. In view of facts mentioned in para no.5 of the instruction as quoted above, there is no necessity to pass any further order in the matter as the specific stand has been taken by the gram panchayat that he is not raising construction in the bhoomidhari plot of the petitioner rather the construction is going on over plot no.111/2. 9. In view of the facts mentioned in the instruction, no interference is required in the matter. 10. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 C.Prakash Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad