Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
215-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CWP-5683-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.07.2025
Salaudeen
…Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and Others
...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- None for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.
Mr. Prince Singh, Advocate for respondents No.2 to 5.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 16.09.2024 and even today, no one has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
2.
From the perusal of the previous orders, it comes out that there was normally no representation of the petitioner on the previous occasions. It appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.
3.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
4.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE 09.07.2025 Prince Chawla
Whether Speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable:
Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.09 18:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document