Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28214 (CHH)

SURESH KUMAR PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5403/2025 · 2025-06-19

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26480 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5403 of 2025 1 - Suresh Kumar Patel S/o Bhuwaneshwar Patel Aged About 34 Years Posted As Lecturer (Mathmatics ) At Govt. High School Kewdabadi, District -Raigarh (C.G.) R/o Village Karichhapar, Poste Office Chikhali District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director of Public Instructions (Dpi) Through Its Director Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner/Applicant : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For State/Respondent : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 20-06-2025 1. Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated 07-06-2025 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from the Govt. High School Kewdabadi, District Raigarh to Govt. Higher Secondary School Datuad, Block Jaijaipur, District Sakti (C.G.) under the Rationalization Instructions dated 02-08-2024. 2. Learned counsel for the parties would jointly submit that the respondent Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 No.5, District Education Officer has considered the representation of the petitioner and going to issue necessary orders of posting of the petitioner after considering his representation and therefore, in view of the above the petition may be disposed of. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, further considering that the representation of the petitioner has been considered by the respondent No.5 and formal order is to be passed by him, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.5 to pass necessary orders within a week from the date of receipt of copy of this order with respect to the decision taken on the representation of the petitioner as per the instructions received by the parties. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same if occasion so arises. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil