APHC010400872025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 20734/2025 Between: 1. RAPOLU ROHINI LAKSHMI, W/O. RAPOLU RAMESH, AGED 32, R/O. 2-49, HIGH SCHOOL STREET, POTHAVARAM, NALLAJERLA, EAST GODAVARI. 2. PASAGADA GYNA SAI MUKESH, S/O. SRINIVASU, AGED 28, R/O. 6-13-10, KANKATALA VARI VEEDHI, T.NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MINISTRY OF HOME, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION OF HOUSE OFFICE SHO, NALLAJERLA POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SI, NALLAJERLA POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE ASI, NALLAJERLA POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. RAPOLU RAMESH, S/O. DURGA PRASAD, AGED 36, R/O. 2-49, HIGH SCHOOL STREET, POTHAVARAM, NALLAJERLA MANDAL EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. RAPOLU VENKATA LAKSHMI, W/O. DURGA PRASAD, AGED 52, R/O. 2-49, HIGH SCHOOL STREET, POTHAVARAM, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. RAPOLU DURGA PRASAD, S/O.NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. AGED 57, R/O. 2-49, HIGH SCHOOL STREET, POTHAVARAM, NALLAJERLA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KATHA SIVA SAI CHANDRA SUBHASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in repeatedly calling the petitioners to attend the Nallajerla Police Station, at the instance of respondents 6 to 8, as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and against the principals of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to call the petitioners to the Police Station compelling to withdraw Crime No. 89 of 2025 of Mahila Urban Police Station, Rajahmundry.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, in view of the crime registered against the Petitioners, the present writ petition is filed with false allegations against Respondents - Police. Hence, the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Katha Siva Sai Chandra Subhash, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20734 of 2025 Dt.07.08.2025 Dinesh