Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2821 (UTT)

ANJANA CHADDA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/323/2021 · 2025-06-26

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.322 of 2021 With WPCRL No.323 of 2021 WPCRL No.326 of 2021 WPCRL No.329 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Narendra Bali, learned counsel for the petitioner(s). 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA along with Ms. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel supplied instructions dated 04.11.2024 which are taken on record. On instructions, he submits that after investigation, final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioner(s). 4. In view of the statement made by learned State Counsel, nothing survives in these writ petitions. Accordingly, the writ petitions are hereby closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 26.06.2025 AK