Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28201 (HP)

ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. SUNITA DEVI

CMP/25718/2024 · 2025-01-06

Sushil Kukreja

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sunita Devi & Ors. CMPs No. 25718 and 25719 of 2024 in FAO No.453 of 2015 06.01.2025 Present: Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate for non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Rakesh Chauhan, Advocate for the applicants/respondents. CMP No. 25718 of 2024 The present application under Order 32 Rule 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been maintained by applicant/respondent No. 2, namely, Mannat Mehra, for discharging her natural guardian i.e. her mother, respondent No.1, Sunita Devi, as she has attained the age of majority. Learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant submitted that he doesn't intend to file any reply to the present application and has no objection, in case, the same is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with affidavit of the aforesaid applicant/respondent No.2, as well as taking into consideration the fact that she has now attained the age of majority, as is evident from her School Certificates annexed with the application, the present application is allowed and her natural guardian, i.e. her mother, respondent No.1, Sunita Devi, is ordered to be discharged from her guardianship; and she is permitted to pursue the case in her own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 25719 of 2024 Learned counsel for the non-applicant prays for and is granted four weeks’ time to file reply. List thereafter. (Sushil Kukreja) January 06, 2025 Judge (Sumit)