Sri Kalayana Venkateshwara Swam)/ Devasthanam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal
WP/33865/2016 · 2025-02-05
K Manmadha Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28198 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28198 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010400912016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 33865/2016 Between: Sri Kalayana Venkateshwara Swam)/ Devasthanam ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its Principal and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP)
2. A SREEKANTH REDDY(SC FOR ENDOW RS) The Court made the following:
ORDER: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr L.J. Veera Reddy,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J. Date: 05.02.2025 TM