Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 1. Rohiya Beeve 2. Peerumohammed 3. Ubes Khan 4. A.Jereena Begum ...Petitioners Vs 1. N.Muruganandam The Secretary to Government, Finance (Pension Department) Fort St.George, Chennai -9 2. Balasubramanian The Director, Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 2 3. Sunder Singh Branch Manager, Nesamony Transport Corporation imited Nagercoil, Rani Thottam Branch-1, Kanniya Kumari (D.T.) 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 4. Merlin Jayanthi Tamilnadu Sate Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Nagercoil Zonal, Rani Thottam, Nesamani Nagar, Nagercoil - 629 001 6. D.K.Sekar I.A.& A.S., The Accountant General of Tamilnadu Accounts and Entitlement, Teynampet, Chennai ...Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for committing contempt of Court by willfully disobeying the order dated 30.09.2022 in W.P.No.21118 of 2015 passed by this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.P.Rajesh M/s C.S.Associates For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan, AAG Assisted by Mr.C.Gowthamaraj for R3 and R4 Mr.Vijay Shankar for R5 Mr.Azizullakhan for R1 ORDER It is brought to the notice of this Court that in identical matters, as that of the order passed in Writ Petition, the Government had preferred Writ Appeals in W.A.Nos.2105 and 2229 of 2025 and Interim Orders have 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 also been granted. 2. Since it is represented that order against which the present contempt petition filed is similar in nature and also the Government has preferred Writ Appeal in W.A.No.2350 of 2025 as against the order passed in W.P.No.21118 of 2025 and when the Hon'ble Division Bench has taken cognizance of the appeals and has proceeded with it, it would not be appropriate for this Court to parallelly proceed with the Contempt Petition. However, if liberty is granted to the petitioners to workout their remedies, after final orders are passed in the Writ Appeal, a balance can be struck. 3.Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioners to workout their remedies subject to the outcome of the Writ Appeal. 25.07.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order ssd 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 M.S.RAMESH, J., ssd To 1. N.Muruganandam The Secretary to Government, Finance (Pension Department) Fort St.George, Chennai -9 2. Balasubramanian The Director, Tamilnadu State Transport corporation, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai - 2 3. Sunder Singh Branch Manager, Nesamony Transport Corporation imited Nagercoil, Rani Thottam Branch-I, Kanniya Kumari (D.T.) 4. Merlin Jayanthi Tamilnadu Sate Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Nagercoil Zonal, Rani Thottam, Nesamani Nagar, Nagercoil - 629 001 6. D.K.Sekar I.A.S., The Accountant General of Tamilnadu Accounts and Entitlement, Teynampet, Chennai Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.2104 of 2025 25.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis