2025:HHC:12244 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA LPA No.504 of 2024 Decided on:02.05.2025 __________________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar and another .....Appellants Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1Whether approved for reporting? For the appellants: Mr. P.D. Nanda and Mr. Sandeep Chauhan, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rakesh Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice [Oral] During the course of argument, it transpires that the awarded amount has been paid, inspite of the writ petition having been dismissed. 2. Perusal of grounds of appeal also would go on to show that the amount has been paid and therefore, counsel for the appellants now has pressed for the issue of interest. 3. Keeping in view the above, we are of the 2025:HHC:12244 - 2 - considered opinion that separate cause of action has now arisen to the appellants to seek their remedy(ies) in accordance with law. 4. Resultantly the present appeal has been rendered infructuous, in view of the changed circumstances. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 2nd May, 2025 [himani/bhardwaj]