- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19010 WP No. 15978 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 15978 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: M/S. SWASTIKS MASALAS PICKLES AND FOOD PRODUCT PVT. LTD. (COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1956) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 446, 18TH MAIN, 4TH T BLCOK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041. REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE PRESIDENT SAKETHA KUMAR M.R SON OF M.S RAJAGOPAL AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI.MOHAMED RIZWAN AHAMED., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD, (A GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING) #49, 4TH AND 5TH FLOORS, 'EAST WING', KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19010 WP No. 15978 of 2025 BENGALURU - 560 001. BY ITS SECRETARY-2. 3. M/S. KARTHIK ENTERPRISES #302, 32ND MAIN, 17TH CROSS, 6TH PHASE, J.P.NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078. (PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN) REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR D.K.NANJEGOWDA. 4. STATE BY DY.SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HEBBUGODI DIISION, BOMMASANDRA, BANGALORE - 560 078. REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JOFTAR SHAH, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO-A) ISSUE A WRIT OF APPROPRIATE NATURE DECLARING THE ACTION OF THE FOURTH RESPONDENT INTERFERING WITH CIVIL DISPUTE/STOPPING THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ILLEGAL, WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL BEING VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14, 19, 21, 300 A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19010 WP No. 15978 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo which reads as here under: "The Counsel for the Petitioner humbly prays this Hon'ble Court be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above said petition, with a liberty to file a fresh petition in the event, if the Fourth Respondent/police again interferes with his peaceful possession and construction activities at the scheduled property mentioned in the above said petition, in the interest of justice." In light of the same, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to initiate proceedings regarding the same cause of action if circumstance so arises. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29