Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010100442025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1655/2025 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT 3, MIDDLETON STREET, KOLKATA AND ONE OF THE REGIONAL OFFICES KNOWN AS GUWAHATI REGIONAL OFFICE AT G.S. ROAD, BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI 5 VERSUS ALOKJAN BIBI AND 5 ORS W/O LATE ISMAIL MANDAL, VILL. NORTH TOKRERCHARA, PART-I, P.O. GOLAKGANJ, P.S. GOLAKGANJ, PIN 78334, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM. 2:GADULI BEWA W/O LATE ABDUL SHEIKH VILL. NORTH TOKRERCHARA PART-1 P.O. GOLAKGANJ P.S. GOLAKGANJ PIN 78334 DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 3:ANOWAR MANDAL S/O LATE ISMAIL MANDAL VILL. NORTH TOKRERCHARA PART-1 P.O. GOLAKGANJ PIN 78334 P.S. GOLAKGANJ DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 4:MONOWAR MANDAL S/O LATE ISMAIL ANDAL VILL NORTH TOKRERCHARA PART 1 P.O. GOLAKGANJ P.S. GOLAKGANJ Page No.# 2/3 PIN 78334 DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 5:SUNIL KR PRADHANI S/O BHOLA NATH PRADHANI VILL. AND P.O. RATIADAHA P.S. GOLAKGANJ IN 783334 DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM. 6:TITUN MAZUMDAR S/O DULAL MAZUMDAR VILL. TOKRACHARA P.O. GOLAKGANJ P.S. GOLAKGANJ PIN 783334 DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K K BHATTA, MRS L SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. P A AHMED (R-1 TO 4), Linked Case : MAC App./5726/2025 (Filing Number) NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED REGIONAL OFFICE AT G S ROAD BHANGAGARH GHY VERSUS ALOKJAN BIBI R/O VILL NORTH TOKRERCHARA PO GOLAKGANJ PS GOLAKGANJ 2:GADULI BEWA R/O VILL NORTH TOKRERCHERA PART 1 PO GOLAKGANJ PS GOLAKGANJ 3:ANOWAR MANDAL R/O VILL NORTH TOKRERCHARA PART 1 PO GOLAKGANJ PS GOLAKGANJ 4:MONOWAR MANDAL R/O VILL NORTH TOKRERCHARA PART 1 PO GOLAKGANJ PS GOLAKGANJ 5:SUNIL KR PRADHANI VILL RATIADAHA PO RATIADAHA PS GOLAKGANJ Page No.# 3/3 6:TITUN MAZUMDAR R/O VILL TOKRACHARA PO GOLAKGANJ PS GOLAKGANJ ------------ Advocate for : ALOK KUMAR BHATTACHARYYA Advocate for : appearing for ALOKJAN BIBI BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 12.11.2025 Heard Mr. K.K. Bhatta, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. P.A. Ahmed, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 44 days of delay in preferring the connected MAC Appeal. 3. Mr. P.A. Ahmed has submitted that he has objection to the prayer made by Bhatta. 4. I have gone through the application and found that the delay has been satisfactorily explained. 5. Accordingly, the delay stands condoned. 6. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. 7. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant