2025:JHHC:16614 2025:JHHC:16615 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7344 of 2024 ------ 1.Sanjay Barnwal, son of late Vanshi Modi, resident of village Gandhi School Road, Prabhat Colony, Ward No. 25, PO and PS Telaiya, District Koderma 2.Sita Devi @ Seeta Devi, wife of late Vijay Rana 3.Vikash Kumar Rana, son of Vijay Rana 4.Sonu Kumar, son of Vijay Rana 5.Akbar Miyan, son of late Ashraf Miyan Petitioner nos. 2 to 5 are resident of village Bhadodih, PO and PS Telaiya, District Koderma … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Rajendra Rana, son of Sona Rana, R/o village Moriyawam, Ward no. 28, PO and PS Telaiya, District Koderma … … Opposite Party(s) With A.B.A. No.7488 of 2024 ------ Vijay Rana, son of late Nunu Rana, resident of village Kariyabar, PO and PS Koderma, District Koderma … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Rajendra Rana, son of Sona Rana, R/o village Moriyawam, Ward no. 28, PO and PS Telaiya, District Koderma … … Opposite Party(s) ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate. Ms. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : Ms. Ruby Pandey, A.P.P. Mr. Sardhu Mahto, APP ----- 04/ 23.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. These anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, have been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest for offences registered under Sections 323, 341, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in 2025:JHHC:16614 2025:JHHC:16615 2 connection with Complaint Case No. 1930 of 2023. 3. Inspite of notice the informant has not appeared. 4. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Since the case arises of compliant there is no question of custodial investigation. Further cognizance has already been taken and summons have been issued. 6. In view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar” reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273 and “Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and Anr.” reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51, I direct the petitioners to appear before the trial Court since there is no question of arrest in these cases and take appropriate steps. 7. Accordingly, these Anticipatory Bail Applications stand disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Tanuj/Cp-3