MATAJI SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, WAGHALA, TQ AND DISTRICT NANDED v. SHRI APPASO BALAPPA DHULAJ, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, OTHER BACKWARD BAHUJAN WELFARE DEPARTMENT
CP/672/2025 · 2025-10-07
Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Vaishali Patil Jadhav
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28186 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28186 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CPs 961 669 2025 & 962 672 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 669 OF 2025 IN CP/843/2024 Shrikrushna Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Kuntur Tanda, Tq. Naigaon, District Nanded Through Its President VERSUS Shri. Appaso Balappa Dhulaj (IAS), Principal Secretary, Other Backward Bahujan Welfare Department And Another AND CONT. PETITION NO. 672 OF 2025 IN CP/842/2024 Mataji Shikshan Sanstha, Waghala, CIDCO, Nanded Through Its President VERSUS Shri. Appaso Balappa Dhulaj (IAS), Principal Secretary, Other Backward Bahujan Welfare Department And Another … • Mr. Jadhav Vinod Baburao, Advocate for the Petitioner in both CPs • Mr. K. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent/s – State in both CPs … CORAM :
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, JJ. DATE :
OCTOBER 07, 2025 P E R C O U R T :
1. By order dated 03.04.2023, this Court directed the respondents to consider the proposal of the petitioners. Respondents have considered and rejected the proposal of the petitioners by order dated 26.09.2025. Affidavit to that effect along with copy of the said order is placed on record. komal kamble
1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:28715-DB
CPs 961 669 2025 & 962 672 2025
2. Learned advocate for the petitioners tried to address the merits of the said order.
3. Since the order is complied with by the respondents, contempt petitions are disposed of.
4. Petitioners are at liberty to challenge the said order by adopting appropriate legal proceedings.
[VAISHALI PATIL–JADHAV, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] komal kamble
2/2