201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2301-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision:29.08.2025 Gurnam Singh and others ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Sonak, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Navjot Kaur, Advocate for Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate, for respondents No.4 to 8. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI , J. (Oral) 1. Nobody has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioners. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.4 to 8 submitted that she has no instructions in the present case. 3. The prayer in the present petition is for challenging the order (Annexure P-1) whereby the election petition was decided and the same was challenged in appeal. The present petition is of the year 2001 and the election of the society was held in the year 1998 and almost 27 years have expired. Today, the counsel for the petitioners has not appeared and the counsel appearing on behalf of respondents No.4 to 8 has stated that she has no instructions in the present case. RAKESH KUMAR 2025.08.29 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-2301-2001 (O&M) -2- 4. In view of the above, this Court is of the considered view that with the efflux of time, nothing would survive in the present petition and the same is hereby dismissed. 29.08.2025 (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) rakesh JUDGE Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2025.08.29 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment