[2025:RJ-JP:1695] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 326/2025 Gangashankar @ Siyaram Son Of Shivprakash, Aged About 19 Years, Resident Of Laangdiyo Ki Dhani, Bapui, Police Station Mitrapura, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail, Sawaimadhopur, District Sawaimadhopur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.0206/2024 registered at Police Station Mitrapura, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(3) & 318(4) of B.N.S., 2023, Sections 66B and 66D of Information Technology Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. There is allegation against the petitioner that he committed fraud and prepared fabricated videos for increasing subscribers on You-Tube, Facebook and Instagram. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is a young boy, who is aged about 19 years. The petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. There is no [2025:RJ-JP:1695] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-326/2025] criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Trial of the case may take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner; especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; petitioner is a young boy, who is aged about 19 years; there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Gangashankar @ Siyaram Son Of Shivprakash shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall [2025:RJ-JP:1695] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-326/2025] mark his presence in first week of every month, till trial is concluded. 8. If breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J Sunita/285