Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28176 (RAJ)

SMT GEETA DEVI v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/7139/2016 · 2025-03-28

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14337] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7139/2016 Smt. Geeta Devi W/o Late Shri Rajesh Kumar Bairwa, aged about 47 years, Resident of 11, Baagwan Vihar, Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan Path, Jaipur Raj. 2. Additional Director General Of Police, Planning And Welfare, Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur Raj. 3. Inspector General Of Police Headquarters, Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Sahakar Marg, Jaipur Raj. 4. District Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer Raj. ----Respondents With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7265/2016 Smt. Geeta Devi W/o Late Shri Rajesh Kumar Bairwa, aged about 47 years, Resident of 11, Baagwan Vihar, Jaipur Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan Path, Jaipur Raj. 2. Secretary, Department Of Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan Path, Jaipur Raj. 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Planning And Welfare, Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur Raj. 4. 5. 6. 7. Inspector General Of Police Headquarters, Rajasthan, Police Headquarters, Sahkar Marg, Jaipur Raj. District Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer Senior Deputy Secretary Police, Home Group-I Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jan Path, Jaipur Raj. Director, Information And Public Relations Directorate, [2025:RJ-JP:14337] (2 of 2) [CW-7139/2016] Rajasthan, Jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Namita Parihar, Dy.G.C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2025 The present petitions are listed under the directions of the Hon’ble Chief Justice, under the head of ‘old legacy matters’. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner had expired during the currency of the present petition, and despite his best efforts he could not establish any contact with the legal heirs or legal representatives of the deceased petitioners. Consecutively, learned counsel has submitted that the present petitions may be dismissed however, a liberty be granted to the petitioners. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, the present petitions are dismissed. However, the petitioners are granted a liberty that if the need so arises, in future, or if the legal representatives are interested to contest the matter, the same may be revived, by moving appropriate application(s), stating justified reasons. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Neeru/37 & 40