2025:JHHC:14839 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(S) No. 2496 of 2025 ---- 1. Sudama Ram, aged about 51 years, son of Late Ramdas Ram, resident of village, PO & PS-Danda, District-Garhwa 2. Ram Pravesh Kumar, aged about 37 years, son of Shree Asarfi Ram, resident of village-Bishunpura, P.Θ.- Koichia, P.S.- Bishunpura, District-Garhwa 3. Bharat Sah, aged about 49 years, son of late Fudani sah, resident of Village-Sagma P.O.- Katahar Kala, P.S. Dhurki, District Garhwa. .....Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through Chief Secretary, Project Bhawan, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi; 2. Deputy commissioner Garhwa, PO & PS- Garhwa, district- Garhwa; 3. District Development Commissioner, Garhwa, PO & PS- Garhwa, district- Garhwa; 4. Block Development officer Danda, PO & PS- Danda, district- Garhwa 5. Block Development officer Bishunpura, PO & PS- Bishunpura, district- Garhwa 6. Block Development officer Sagma, PO & PS- Sagma, district- Garhwa ....Respondents -- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN -- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashim Kumar Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ashish Kumar, S.C(Mines)-III -- 02/09.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners for the following reliefs: For a direction upon the respondents to consider their cases for regularization in service on the post of Night Guards with all consequential benefits including their arrear salary, within a specified period. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that the issue is of regularization has been set at rest by Hon’ble Apex Court and also by this Court in W.P.(S) No. 525 of 2021. Accordingly, the Respondent Authorities may be directed to take a decision in the matter of regularization of these Petitioners in view of the aforesaid judgment. 2025:JHHC:14839 2 4. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that since no counter affidavit has been filed; as such, the Petitioners may be directed to approach the Respondent no. 2 for redressal of their grievance. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid submissions and looking to the prayer made in this writ application, this writ application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh representation before the 2nd Respondent along with all supporting documents. If any such representation is preferred before the Respondent no.2, the same shall be disposed of, in accordance with law and applicable Rules and Regulation by passing a reasoned and speaking order and the same shall be communicated to these Petitioners within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. 6. Accordingly, this writ application stands disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) jk