Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28174 (RAJ)

RAMAN S/O MOHAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10663/2025 · 2025-09-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10663/2025 Raman S/o Mohar Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Khandip, Police Station Vajirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anju Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 214/2024 registered at Police Station Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli for the offences under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case solely on the basis of disclosure statement of other co-accused Jitendra, from whom less than commercial quantity of smack (14.70 miligram) was recovered. It is contended that apart from the disclosure statement of co-accused there is no substantive evidence available on the record indicating the involvement of the present petitioner in regularly getting the smack from co-accused Jitendra Meena. The accused-petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:36170] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10663/2025] 03.08.2024 and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore considering the above facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments putforth by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Raman S/o Mohar Singh, in connection with FIR No. 214/2024 registered at Police Station Mahaveer Ji, District Karauli shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /9