Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28170 (ALL)

MANOJ PATEL AND 38 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WTAX/963/2025 · 2025-03-11

Piyush Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:36375 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 963 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manoj Patel And 38 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjeev Singh,Shailendra Kumar,Sheo Kinkar Singh,Suryaprakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarified that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available under the law. Order Date :- 12.3.2025 Rahul Dwivedi/- Digitally signed by :- RAHUL DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad