253 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARJUN DASS AND ORS MANISHA AHUJA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Present:- NAMIT KUMAR, J.(Oral) 1. Cr.P.C., seeking setting aside of the orders by the learned JMIC, Ludhiana, in case No.6 dated 26.02.2013, registered under Section the order dated 01.10.2019, in Criminal Appeal marked as CRM No.256 of 2019 passed by the learned Se Ludhiana (Annexure P 2. copy of the compromise deed dated 25.09.2025 entered between her and her husband which is taken on record. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10399 Date of Decision: ARJUN DASS AND ORS Versus MANISHA AHUJA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. P.K. S. Phoolka, Advocate for the petitioners. Respondent-Manisha Ahuja, is present in person. NAMIT KUMAR, J.(Oral) The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking setting aside of the orders by the learned JMIC, Ludhiana, in case No.6 dated 26.02.2013, registered under Section 12 of the DV Act (Annexure P the order dated 01.10.2019, in Criminal Appeal marked as CRM No.256 of 2019 passed by the learned Se Ludhiana (Annexure P-3). Respondent, who is present in the Court compromise deed dated 25.09.2025 entered between her and her husband which is taken on record. The same reads as under: “ The compromise deed is executed at Chandigarh this 25th day of September, 2025 by and between the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 10399-2020 (O&M) Date of Decision: 25.09.2025 …Petitioners …Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR Manisha Ahuja, is present in person. The instant petition has been filed under Section 482 dated 10.07.2018, passed by the learned JMIC, Ludhiana, in case No.6 dated 26.02.2013, 12 of the DV Act (Annexure P-2) as well as the order dated 01.10.2019, in Criminal Appeal marked as CRM No.256 of 2019 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, District present in the Court, has produced a compromise deed dated 25.09.2025 entered between her The same reads as under:- compromise deed is executed at day of September, 2025 by and between the following:- HIMANSHU 2025.09.26 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10399-2020 -2- I, Manisha Ahuja wife of Vimal Kumar Ahuja son of late Sh. Arjun Dass Ahuja, presently Resident of H.No. 26, Adarsh Colony, Patiala hereinafter called the First Party has entered into a compromise with the Second Party Vimal Ahuja in CRM No.37694/2022 in CRM-M-No.10399 of 2020. Vimal Ahuja son of late Sh. Arjun Dass, presently Resident of H.No.26, Adarsh Colony, Patiala hereinafter called the Second Party. Whereas it has been settled that Vimal Ahuja husband of the First Party, Neetu Rani w/o Jaswinder Singh, Deepika Ahuja w/o Gurpreet Singh and Divya Ahuja w/o Prince Duggal have equal rights and share in property of late Sh. Arjun Dass s/o late Sh. Gobind Ram house bearing No.233, Kartarpura Mohalla, Akali Mohan Singh Street Nabha, District Patiala. The Second Party will not transfer his equal share and rights which are in his father’s property and inherited by him from his father to co-sharers and co-owners i.e. daughters of late Sh. Arjun Dass who are real sisters of the second party and to other persons. The sisters of the second party will not raise any objection in this regard. The first party has already withdrawn execution petitions filed in case u/s 125 Cr.P.C. by making her statements in the Court of Sh. Gurpartab Singh, Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ludhiana. That both the parties i.e. the first party and the second party have agreed to abide by all the HIMANSHU 2025.09.26 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10399-2020 -3- terms and conditions of the compromise executed between both the parties on 25.09.2025.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent are ad idem that since the matter has been settled between respondent and her husband, therefore, she will not make any claim from the petitioners in future. 4. In this view of the matter, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. 5. Disposed of as having become infructuous. 6. Needless to say that parties shall bound by the terms and conditions set out in the compromise deed. (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE 25.09.2025 himanshu Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No HIMANSHU 2025.09.26 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document