209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9960-2025 Date of decision: 14.05.2025 ANURAG KUMAR @ ANURAG MANKHAND ...Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present:- Mr. Pratham Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Gurpartap S. Bhullar, Asst. A.G., Punjab. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral) 1. At the outset, the learned State counsel has submitted on instructions from ASI Sukhwinder Singh that a cancellation report has already been filed in the present FIR and therefore, the custody of the petitioner is not required for further investigation. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the aforesaid statement made by the learned State counsel, the present petition may be disposed of. 3. Ordered accordingly. (JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) 14.05.2025 JUDGE Chetan Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No CHETAN THAKUR 2025.05.15 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.