Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28165 (AP)

CH NAGESWARA RAO v. SAI JAWAHAR REDDY

CC(AT)/1/2022 · 2025-07-17

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010400282022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 1/2022 Between: 1. CH NAGESWARA RAO, S/O CH VEERAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RETIRED OCC NMR WORK INSPECTOR O/O RWS SUB DIVISION TANUKU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT R/O H NO 6/9/2 OLD TOWN TANUKU V AND M WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. SAI JAWAHAR REDDY, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DEPT ANDHRA PRADESH SECRERATIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. SRI K KRISHNA KISHORE KUMAR, ENGINEER IN CHIEF RWS AND S DEPT GOLLAPUDI 3. SRI K RAVI BABU, CHIEF ENGINEER ADMINISTRATION RWS AND S DEPT GOLLAPUDI 4. SRI N AMARESWARA RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINERR RWS AND S CIRCLE ELURU WEST GODAVARI DISTICT 5. SRI G SRINIVAS PRASAD, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RWS AND S KOVVUR WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 6. SRI V VIJAY KUMAR, DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER RWS AND S SUB DIVISION TANUKU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Pleased to Summon and punish the respondent under the contempt of court Act for not implementing the orders of the Honble Tribunal OA No 4914/2015 dated 28/8/2017 for not considering the case of the applicant and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V ASHOK KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE (AT) NO.1 of 2022 ORDER:- 1. On 11.07.2025, since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was posted to 18.07.2025 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. None appeared even today when the matter is taken up, despite listing under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 3. Hence, writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand dismissed. No costs. _____________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date:18.07.2025 SP 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE (AT) NO.1 of 2022 Date: 18.07.2025 W SP