Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28162 (JHR)

CHANDAN KUMAR YADAV ALIAS CHANDAN YADAV@ CHANDAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10249/2024 · 2025-01-10

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 10244 of 2024 Sandeep Roushan Babu, son of Kali Yadav, aged about 18 years, resident of village Sardhwatand, Brinda, Rampur, P.O Rampur, P.S. Chouparan, District Hazaribag --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party With B.A No. 10249 of 2024 Chandan Kumar Yadav @ Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar, son of Babulal Yadav, resident of village Brinda, P.O Rampur, P.S. Chouparan, District Hazaribag --- --- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand --- --- Opp. Party --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath --- For the Petitioners: Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate [B.A.10244/2024] Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate [B.A. 10249/2024] For the O.P-State: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. [both cases] --- 03 / 10.01.2025 Both these bail applications arise out of the same police case. As such, they are being disposed of a common order. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioners have been made accused in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 217 of 2024 for the offences registered under sections 316 (2) 316(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and section 66(B), 66(C) and 84(C) of I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma. 3. 05.09.2024, Telaiya Police on the basis of confidential information that a racket of Escort Service was being operated by some accused persons, apprehended these petitioners and mobile phone and e-gadgets were recovered from their possession. 4. It was submitted that no witnesses have come forward to state that the petitioners were providing Escort Services to them. It was further submitted that apart from suspicion, there is no other material against the petitioners on the record. 5. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail, but does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 6. In view of the submission made above, petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 217 of 2024. (Ambuj Nath, J) Ranjeet/ Uploaded