Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28158 (KAR)

PADMA v. THE TAHASILDAR

WP/16685/2025 · 2025-07-11

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25678 WP No. 16685 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16685 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. PADMA W/O. LATE N.R. ANNAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS RESIDING AT T.B. NAGAMANGALA TOWN, EXTENSION, 1ST WARD, SUBHASH NAGAR, MANDYA MANDYA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE TAHASILDAR MANDYA DISTRICT MANDYA - 571432. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO MAKE OUT KATHA OF THE LAND MEASURING 161/2 GUNTAS IN SURVEY NO. 553 OF NAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, NAGAMANGALA TALUK, PURSUANT TO THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 18.10.2024 PRODUCED BY THE PETITIONER AT ANNEXURE D. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25678 WP No. 16685 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. Siddarth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. In this writ petition, it is the case of the petitioner that, he has made an application to the respondent-Thasildar, to enter his name in the revenue records as per representation dated 16.10.2024 in terms of the order passed by the Land Tribunal, Nagamangala, in ISICR 57,59,100,102/83- 84 (Annexure-A). 4. In that view of the matter, respondent is directed to consider the representation dated 16.10.2024 produced at Annexure- D, within an outer - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25678 WP No. 16685 of 2025 limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. It is made clear that, this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28