Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28154 (CHH)

BHURWA RAM SIDAR v. NARENDRA KUMAR SIDAR

MAC/1323/2019 · 2025-04-15

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17187 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1323 of 2019 1. Bhurwa Ram Sidar S/o Sidar Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Diksi, P.S. And Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Janjgir- Campa, Chhattisgarh. 2. Smt. Guddi Bai Gond W/o Bhurwa Ram Sidar Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Diksi, P.S. And Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Janjgir-Campa, Chhattisgarh. 3. Mahendra Sidar S/o Bhurwa Ram Sidar Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Diksi, P.S. And Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Janjgir-Campa, Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh. 4. Ku. Jyoti Sidar D/o Bhurwa Ram Sidar Aged About 18 Years R/o Village Diksi, P.S. And Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Janjgir-Campa, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants/Claimants versus 1. Narendra Kumar Sidar S/o Bhurwa Ram Sidar Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Diksi, P.S. And Tahsil Malkharouda, District- Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh (Driver). 2. I. C. I. C. Lombard General Insurance Company Office No. So 5, Second Floor, V. R. Plaza, Link Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Appellants : None. For Respondents : None. SOURABH PATEL Digitally signed by SOURABH PATEL Date: 2025.04.16 09:18:26 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 15/04/2025 1. Today none appears on behalf of the appellants even when the case is taken up for hearing in second round and also on 01.04.2025 no one has been appearing on behalf of the appellants, it appears that the appellants are not interested in this case. 2. In the absence of any representation on behalf of the appellants, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge Sourabh P.