Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28152 (ALL)

AWADHESH KUMAR v. BOARD OF REVENUE UP AT PRAYAGRAJ AND 5 OTHERS

WRIB/931/2025 · 2025-03-10

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35356 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 931 of 2025 Petitioner :- Awadhesh Kumar Respondent :- Board Of Revenue Up At Prayagraj And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhay Raj Yadav,Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Akhilesh Prasad Tripathi,C.S.C.,Hari Narayan Singh Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Tarun Gaur, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents, Mr. Akhilesh Prasad Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Mr. Hari Narayan Singh, learned counsel for Land Management Committee. 2.The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "(I). Issue a writ order of dir4ection in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 Board of Revenue U.P. at Prayagraj to decide the Revision No.3218/2023 Computer case No.AL20230339003218 (Shri Virajman Mandir Ram Janki and another vs. State of U.P. and others) U/S 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that revision filed by contesting respondent Nos.2 and 3 under Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending before respondent No.1/Board of Revenue, Allahabad. He submitted that petitioner is respondent No.4 in the aforementioned revision. He submitted that revision is pending since 01.10.2023. He further placed certified copy of the order sheet of the pending proceeding, which has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously. 4. Mr. Akhilesh Prasad Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted that petitioner is taking adjournment in the pending proceeding before the Board of Revenue, as such the instant petition cannot be entertained. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.1/Board of Revenue, U.P. Allahabad to consider and decide the aforementioned revision in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 PS* Digitally signed by :- PRITI SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad