Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28151 (DEL)

SH. SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF DELHI NCT AND ORS

CRL.M.C./5842/2025 · 2025-08-25

Neena Bansal Krishna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5842/2025 SH. SANJEEV KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhinav Chandan, Mr. Varun Mudgil, Ms. Eti Kushwaha and Mr. Sumit Moudgil, Advocates. versus STATE OF DELHI NCT AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 25.08.2025 CRL.M.A. 24994/2025 (Exemption), CRL.M.A.24995/2025 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Applications stand disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5842/2025 3. Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 /Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘B.N.S.S.‟2023, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners, for quashing of FIR No.1093/2020 under Section 354/323/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC‟) registered at Police Station Bindapur and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Oral Settlement between the parties, which has been submitted to learned JMFC on 18.07.2025. 4. Issue Notice. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2025 at 12:43:36 5. On advance Notice, learned APP has appeared and accepted the Notice on behalf of the State. 6. It is submitted that the Petitioners were residing on the second floor while the Complainant and the victim, were residing on the third floor. It was essentially a neighbourhood dispute, which got escalated. 7. On the Complaint of the Respondent No.2/Complainant, FIR No.1093/2020 under Section 354/323/509/34 of IPC, got registered at Police Station Bindapur. 8. It is submitted that the FIR was a consequence of the neighbourhood disputes between the Complainants and the Petitioners. The quashing Petition is supported by the Affidavits of the Petitioners, as well as, the Complainant and the victim. The matter has been settled out of the Court, orally between the parties and the same has been submitted to the learned JMFC on 18.07.2025. 9. Today, the Respondent No. 2/Complainant, who is present in the Court, states that she has no objection if the said FIR is quashed. 10. The parties are present before this Court in-person today and have been identified by their learned counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. They have entered into the Oral Settlement voluntarily and without any fear and coercion and undertake to remain bound by the terms of the said Oral Settlement. 11. Considering the allegations and also that now the Petitioners have shifted out and there has not ever been any complaint, the FIR No. 1093/2020 under Section 354/323/509/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Bindapur and all the consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2025 at 12:43:36 12. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J AUGUST 25, 2025/RS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/08/2025 at 12:43:36