IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVA|^52^ WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE o I PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 703 OF 2003 Second Appeal under Section 100 pf CPC. aggrieved by the Judgment and decree dated 5-3-2003 made in A.S. No. 22 of 1997 and Cross Objections the file of the Senior Civil Judge,-Tanuku in confirming the Judgment and decree dated 31-08-1994 made in O.S. No. 127/85 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Tanuku. on Between: Kovvuri Mulareddy, S/o Pedda Cultivation, R/o Vengalavaripaldm, Tanuku Sathi Reddy, aged about 30 West Godavari District yrs. ...appellant/ APPELLANT-I/DEFENDANT-1 AND 1. Kovvuri Perreddy (died), rep by his Legal Representatives I^sspondent/Respondent-I/Plaintiff 2. Kovvuri Venkata Reddy, S/o Perreddy, aged about 36 yrs, 3. Kovvuri Kamala, W/o Suryanarayana Reddy, aged about 26 yrs r 4. Velagala Kanakalakshmi, W/o Satyanarayana Reddy, aged about 35 yrs 5. Kovgvuri Ramaratna, W/o Perreddy, aged about 55yrs Respondents/Respondents/L.Rs 6. Kovvuri Gangireddy, S/o Satti Reddy, aged 45 yrs (Appeal against R6 dismissed for default Vide Court Order dated 26-6- 2014) 7. Kovvuri Venkata Lakshmi, W/b China Sattireddy, aged about 50 ....Respondents/Appellant - 2 & 3/Defendant - 2&3 (All are R/o Vengalavaripalem, Tanuku, West Godavari District) yrs ...RESPONDENTS ; l Counsel for the Appellant: None appeared Counsel for the Respondents Nos 2, 4 & 5: SRI A VEERASWAMY The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 0 APHC010399822003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI SECOND APPEAL NO: 703/2003 Between: I \ K.mulareddy ...APPELLANT AND K Perrreddy Died 6 Others ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1.MANCHIKALAPATI RENUKA Counsel for the Respondent: 1.A VEERASWAMY The Court made the following Judgment: Smt.M.Renuka, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that notice was sent to the appellant, for instructions. Though notice was served and the matter is being posted under the caption “for dismissal”, the appellant is not coming forward to prosecute the appeal and hence, necessary orders may be \u. rendered in this Appeal. 2 2. Sri A.Veeraswamy, learned in attendance. counsel for the respondents is 3. In that view of the matter, the Second for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Appeal is dismissed Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER / //TRUE COPY// / To, 1. The Senior Civil Judge, Tanu.u, Wes, Godvari Distdc, (With Records) ■ The Pnncpal District Munsif, Tanuku, West Godavari District 3. One CC to SRI A VEERASWAMY Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Smt. M. Renuka, 5. TheSectionOfficer.V.R. Section 5. Two CD Copies Advocate (OPUC) I High Court of A.P. at Amaravati gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 07/05/2025 JUDGMENT SA.No.703 of 2003 2 6JUN 2025 )S front SectiopXty^ o Co DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL FOR PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS NON