2025:JHHC:12841-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review No.122 of 2024 ----- Uranium Corporation of India Limited (UCIL), Government of India Enterprises, having its office at Turamdih, P.O. Sundarnagar, P.S. Jaduguda, District Singhbhum (East), PIN-832107, through its Manager (Personnel), namely, Sanjeev Ranjan, aged about 43 years, son of Bindeshwari Chaudhary, resident of Qr. No. C/1/2, UCIL Colony, Turamdih, PO & PS- Sundarnagar, District East Singhbhum, PIN-832107 (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner Versus 1. Gunaram Murmu, aged about 31 years, son of Majhia Murmu, resident of Village Sarjamda (Doka Tola), P.O. & P.S. Parshudih, Town-Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 2. The State of Jharkhand. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 4. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dalbhum, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … Respondents ------- CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Vineet Prakash, AC to SC-IV ------ Order No. 04/Dated 29th April, 2025 I.A. No.12472 of 2024 1. The present Interlocutory Application has been filed for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing the instant review petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having regard to the averments made in this application, we are of the view that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause 2025:JHHC:12841-DB 2 from preferring the review petition within the period of limitation. 3. Accordingly, I.A. No.12472 of 2024 is allowed and the 123 days’ delay in preferring the review petition is condoned. Civil Review No.122 of 2024 4. Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner, has submitted that in view of the liberty granted by this Court, as has been referred at paragraph 38 of the judgment dated 02.05.2024 sought to be reviewed, does not intend to press the instant review petition. 5. Such submission has been made in presence of learned counsel for the State. 6. Accordingly, the instant review petition is dismissed as not pressed. 7. Pending interlocutory applications also stand dismissed. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) Birendra/