[2025:RJ-JP:13186] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8817/2011 Smt Muli Bai ----Petitioner Versus State Of Raj And Anr ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Bhardwaj for Mr. Nalin G. Narian JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/03/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy in- volved in this petition is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in case of Anokha Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 372/2013. Counsel submits that this matter pertains to grant of minimum of the pay scale of Class IV employees looking to the long length of their service. Counsel sub- mits that this petition be disposed of in the light of the order passed by this Court in the case of Anokha Bai (Supra). 2. Per contra, counsel for the respondents opposes the argu- ments raised by counsel for the petitioner and submits that this petition be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to ap- proach the State Authorities. Counsel submits that in case, the pe- titioner submit any representation in this regard, the same would be decided strictly in accordance with law. [2025:RJ-JP:13186] (2 of 2) [CW-8817/2011] 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of, granting liberty to the pe- titioner to file representation before the respondents. The respon- dents are expected to decide the same strictly in accordance with law, taking into account the directions issued by this Court in the case of Anokha Bai (Supra) to the extent of its applicability in the present matter. In the eventuality of its applicability, the respon- dents are directed to grant similar benefits to the petitioner as well. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner in a particular way, the re- spondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accor- dance with law. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/172