Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28135 (GAU)

SIBU BANIK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/4662/2020 · 2025-11-16

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010158002020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4662/2020 SIBU BANIK S/O SRI DINESH CH. BANIK RESIDENT OF QTR NO. 1, MAGISTRATE COLONY, D C COMPLEX, UDALGURI, PO, PS AND DIST UDALGURI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SIVASSAGAR SIVASAGAR ASSAM 5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER UDALGURI UDALGURI ASSAM 788801 6:SRI ANANTA SAIKIA Page No.# 2/2 AFS OFFICE OF THE DIRECTORATE OF SPORTS AND YOUTH WELFARE ASSAM GUWAHAT Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B SINHA, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, FINANCE BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 17.11 .2025 Mr. B. Sinha, learned counsel appears for the petitioner submits that the writ petition become infructuous and the writ petitioner does not wish to proceed the writ petition any further. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, is also dismissed. Mr. P. Nayak, learned Addl. Advocate General appears for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 and Mr. A. Chakraborty, learned Junior Government Advocate appears for the respondent No.4 and 5. JUDGE Comparing Assistant