IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.271 of 2025 ------ 1. Harendra Yadav @ Harendra Kumar Yadav, aged about 32 years, S/o Brija Yadav @ Brija Yadav. 2. Yashoda Devi, aged about 66 years, W/o Brija Yadav. 3. Mamta Devi, aged about 31 years, W/o Harendra Yadav @ Harendra Kumar Yadav 4. Brija Yadav @ Brija Yadav, aged about 70 years, S/o Amirka Yadav, all are R/o At- Soba, PO & PS- Haider Nagar, District- Palamau, State- Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22-01-2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 instituted under Sections 108/3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners have abetted the suicide of the deceased. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the independent witness- Vrinda Devi whose statement has been recorded in paragraph-24 of the case-diary, has stated that the deceased- Soni Devi did not take proper care of her son- Rupesh Kumar and there was hot exchange of words in that respect, hence, the deceased committed suicide. It is also submitted that the quarrel was not of such nature so as to provoke a person to commit suicide. It is also submitted that there is no one else than the petitioners to look after the minor son of the deceased. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Palamau in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.71 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/