APHC010399462025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20519/2025 Between: CHANDRAGIRI UTHAIAH, S/O. SUBBANNA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O.MUTTAVANDLA PALLI, RAYACHOTY TOWN, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME (POLICE) DEPARTMENT ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALGIRI, AMARAVATHI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYACHOTY POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534 235. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAYACHOTY U/G. POLICE STATION, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, RAYACHOTY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAPUDIPPU SASHIDAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in taking action on the persons who are spreading false news in relation to death of the deceased and attempting to derail the investigation by the investigation officers in relation to Crime No. 320 2 of 2025 on the file of the 5th Respondent Police station by considering the representations submitted by me as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being contrary to the provisions of the BNSS and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to take action on the representation filed by me.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, investigation has been conducted in Crime No.320 of 2025 and after completion of investigation, charge sheet has also been filed on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rayachoti. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Papudippu Sashidhar Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20519 of 2025 Dt.07.08.2025 Dinesh