PARTAP SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/5008/2025 · 2025-05-01
Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28131 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28131 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-5008-2025 (O&M)
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-5008-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 01.05.2025 Partap Singh and others
....Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate,
and Mr. Tushaar Madaan, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
*** SUDHIR SINGH (ORAL)
By way of the present writ petition, the petitioners have sought issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to consider the matter and allot flats to the petitioners in view of various policies dated 03.11.2008, 21.10.2008/16.10.2008, 29.12.2009/04.01.2010, 29.09.2011, 31.01.2014, 15.05.2015/22.04.2015 and 09.03.2016 (Annexures P-1 to P- 7).
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already made representations/applications dated 15.06.2021 and 15.11.2023 (Annexures P-10 to P-11) to the competent authorities for redressal of their grievances, but no action has been taken thereon till date. He further submits that the petitioners would be satisfied, if the respondent AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.06 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-5008-2025 (O&M)
-2- authorities are directed to deal with their concerns/grievances and pass appropriate order on the said representations.
3.
Served with the advance copy of the petition, Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, Punjab, appears on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that the said representations/applications shall be considered and decided by the competent authority, in accordance with law.
4.
Without commenting on merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Deputy Commissioner, SAS Nagar, Mohali (competent authority), to look into the pending representation/application dated 15.11.2023 (Annexure P-11) and pass an appropriate reasoned order thereon, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy/production of this order.
5.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE
(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE 01.05.2025 Ajay Prasher
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable
: Yes/No AJAY PRASHER 2025.05.06 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document