1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.561 of 2025 ------ Shadab Azmi, son of Sharfuddin Ansari, resident of Juria, P.O. Juria, P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand - 835302. … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 2. Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative & Rajbhasa, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. Secretary, Department of Labour Employment and Training, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 4. Director, Department of Labour Employment and Training, Government of Jharkhand, office at Project Building, Dhurwa, Ranchi. 5. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary, office at Chaibagan, Kali Nagar, Namkum, Ranchi. 6. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, office at Chaibagan, Kali Nagar, Namkum, Ranchi. 7. Secretary, Directorate General of Training, Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, Government of India, office at Employment Exchange Building, Library Avenue, Pusa Complex, Indrapuri, District New Delhi – 110012. … … Respondents ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Gautam, Advocate Mr. Ganesh Ram, Advocate Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate Mr. Sultan Khan Singapuri, Advocate Mr. Sarfraj Ahmed Ansari, Advocate For the Respondent(s): Mr. Faisal Allam, AC to SC Mines-III Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Advocate Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Jay Prakash, Advocate ------ 03/ 07.02.2025 Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the prayers have been wrongly framed in this case and some additional prayer also needs to be incorporated. He submits that by way of amendment, the same cannot be brought as it will make the entire petition clumsy. He further submits that the State has not filed 2 any counter affidavit in defence. 2. On this background, he submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with the liberty to file a fresh writ petition incorporating all the reliefs and facts. 3. The State has got no objection. 4. Considering the said submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant.Cp-2