APHC010399702025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20511/2025 Between: M SRINIVASULU, S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR NO.5-7-1, HARIHARA PURAM COLONY, VANASTALIPURAM, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATYASAI DISTRICT, PUTTAPARTHI 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, C.K.PALLIPOLICE STATION, C.K.PALLI, SATYASAI DISTRICT. 4. SATYANARAYANA, S.I.OF POLICE, C.K.PALLI POLICE STATION, C.K.PALLI SATYASAI DISTRICT. 5. SANJEEV REDDY, CONSTABLE, C.K.PALLI POLICE STATION, C.K.PALLI, SATYASAI DISTRICT. 6. SURESH, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, DODDABALLAPURAM, KARNATAKA STATE. 7. ESWAR, FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PENUKONDAVILLAGE,PENUKONDA MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V N KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of respondent no.2 in acting on petitioner complaint, dated 21-07-2025, through which petitioner has requested to take action against the respondents No.4 to 7 the respondent No.4 and 5 who used third degree methods on petitioner without registration of Fir and acted at behest of the respondents No.6 and 7 as illegal. arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of BNSS, abdication of statutory duty caste on him, apart form be violative fundamental rights, guaranteed to the petitioner under articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to act on the complaint, dated 21-07-2025 submitted by petitioner and register the FIR against the respondents No.4 to 7.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the matter is with regard to monetary transactions between the parties and the Police cannot interfere into the civil disputes. 3. Sri P.V.N.Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20511 of 2025 Dt.07.08.2025 Dinesh