Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2811 (JHR)

K K BUILDERS PVT LTD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR KUMUD RANJAN PATHAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/58/2023 · 2025-03-18

Deepak Roshan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 58 of 2023 -------- K.K. Builders Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Kumud Ranjan Pathak, aged about 48 years, having its Office at Holding No. 27, New Kalimati Road, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, Jaunshedpur, District - East Singhbhum (Jharkhand). … … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 3. Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. & P.S.-Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 4. Chief Engineer (Communication), Road Construction Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, having its office at Engineers Hostel, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. - Dhurwa, District - Ranchi. 5. Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Circle, Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa, District - West Singhbhum. 6. Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Seraikella Kharsawan, P.O. & P.S.-Seraikella, District Seraikella Kharsawan. 7. Rajeev Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner resident of K-125, P.C Colony, Hanuman Nagar, Kankarbagh, P.O & P.S- Kankarbagh, District- Patna (Bihar) … … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandan Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, AC to AAG-V -------- 5/Dated: 18.03.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 2 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending I.A., if any, stands closed. (M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit/Vedanti