Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1101 WP No. 17644 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 17644 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANDRIKA SRINIVAS W/O M SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 99 VIDYAPEETA ROAD KENGERI, BANGALORE 560 060 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN KUMAR B S.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT BYRAMMA W/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS
2.
SMT. JAYAMMA D/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
3.
SMT GANGAMMA D/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
4.
SRI DODDAIAH S/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
5.
SMT. SUNANDA D/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
6.
SMT. MANGALA D/O LATE BALAPPA
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1101 WP No. 17644 of 2024
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
7.
SMT. MAMATHA D/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
8.
SRI RAVI KUMAR S/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
9.
SRI SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
10. SRI DEVARAJ S/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
11. SMT. MANJULA
D/O LATE BALAPPA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT BHEEMANAKUPPE VILLAGE KENGERI HOBLI, RAMOHALLI POST BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560074.
12. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE-560020 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAJANNA.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R11:
SRI. B. VACHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R12)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED: 30.05.2024 PASSED BY III ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL, BENGALURU, IN OS NO.
1163/2012 AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA NO. 12 AT ANNEXURE-F FILED UNDER ORDER VI RULE 17 OF CPC R.W.S.22 OF THE SPECIAL RELIEF ACT 1963 AND ETC.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:1101 WP No. 17644 of 2024
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 13.01.2025 stating that suit itself has been dismissed on 24.10.2024 and hence, the present writ petition has become infructuous.
2. The memo is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 73