Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28108 (KAR)

SRI YASHODHARA v. SMT GOWRAMMA

WP/17520/2024 · 2025-02-04

H T Narendra Prasad

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5056 WP No. 17520 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 17520 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI YASHODHARA S/O B.CHANDRA SHEKAR AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT MUSAKALOTI VILLAGE HULIKUNTE HOBLI, SIRA TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT -572 113 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NATARAJA B S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT GOWRAMMA D/O LATE BYRAPPA W/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS R/AT NO. 1486, 7TH MAIN R.P.C. LAYOUT, BENGALURU -560 040 2. SRI. SHAMSHUDDIN.A S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT NO.600, 8TH MAIN 4TH B CROSS, RPC LAYOUT VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU -560040. 3. SRI. RAVIKUMAR S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.600, 8TH MAIN 4TH B CROSS RPC LAY-OUT VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU -560040 …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5056 WP No. 17520 of 2024 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED: 13.08.2022 (AT ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY NATIONAL LOK- ADALATH HELD ON 13.08.2022 UPON A MEMO DATED 01.08.2022 (AT ANNEXURE-B) AND RESTORE THE SUIT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed by plaintiff No.1 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 13.08.2022 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru in O.S.No.1832/2021 in National Lok Adalath. 2. The plaintiffs withdrawn the suit filed before the trial court on the ground that they have settled the matter out of the Court. The Court has not passed any decree in the matter. Therefore, this writ petition challenging the said order is not maintainable. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE CM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39