201 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA SUBHASH CHANDER ANURAG RASTOGI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Amandeep Vashisth, Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA Learned counsel for the respondent relies up communication dated 23.04.2025 to submit that a sum of Rs.13,00,000/ expenditure towards liver transplant and the same has been released. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives including that of interest etc. filing representation before the q two weeks from period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shal within a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay part of respondent of Rs.50,000/- 24.04.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: SUBHASH CHANDER Versus ANURAG RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Amandeep Vashisth, Advocate for the Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the respondent relies up communication dated 23.04.2025 to submit that a sum of Rs.13,00,000/- has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner as penditure towards liver transplant and the same has been released. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives including that of interest etc., he would be at liberty to raise filing representation before the quarter concerned within a from today, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner thin a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay part of respondent, the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) - to the petitioner from his/her own pocket. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-929-2025 Date of Decision: April 24, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondent HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ravi Pratap Singh, DAG, Haryana. Learned counsel for the respondent relies upon an office communication dated 23.04.2025 to submit that a sum of has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner as penditure towards liver transplant and the same has been released. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner does not However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives would be at liberty to raise his claim by uarter concerned within a period of , which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a l be conveyed to the petitioner thin a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the , the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) from his/her own pocket. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2025 April 24, 2025 on an office communication dated 23.04.2025 to submit that a sum of has been sanctioned in favour of the petitioner as does not However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives claim by of , which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a l be conveyed to the petitioner on the , the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.25 17:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document