Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28103 (RAJ)

MALI DEVI W/O LATE NARAYAN RAM v. RANVIR SINGH S/O KISHOR SINGH

CRES/929/2024 · 2025-07-11

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25648] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 929/2024 IN S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.4344/2019 1. Mali Devi W/o Late Narayan Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Todas, P.s. Chitawa, Tehsil Nawa, District Nagore (Raj.) 2. Hajari Ram S/o Late Narayan Ram, Aged About 12 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Mali Devi, R/o Village Todas, P.s. Chitawa, Tehsil Nawa, District Nagore (Raj.) 3. Babulal S/o Late Narayan Ram, Aged About 10 Years, Minor Through Natural Guardian Mother Smt. Mali Devi, R/o Village Todas, P.s. Chitawa, Tehsil Nawa, District Nagore (Raj.) 4. Bhiwaram S/o Devaram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village Todas, P.s. Chitawa, Tehsil Nawa, District Nagore (Raj.) 5. Galku Devi W/o Bhiwaram, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village Todas, P.s. Chitawa, Tehsil Nawa, District Nagore (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. Ranvir Singh S/o Kishor Singh, R/o Khanadi, P.s. Losal, District Sikar (Raj.) (Vehicle Driver Vehicle Mini Bus No. Rj 23 Pa 6119) 2. Bhanwar Singh S/o Jeevan Singh, R/o Aaguni Kotdi Village Dujod, Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.) (Registered Owner Vehicle Mini Bus No. Rj 23 Pa 6119) 3. United India Insurance Company Ltd., Through Branch Manager, Local Branch, Jaipur Road, Sikar (Raj.) (Insurance Company Vehicle Mini Bus No. Rj 23 Pa 6119) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshat Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 11/07/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:25648] (2 of 2) [CRES-929/2024] 1. An application bearing No.1897/2024 has been filed by the applicants/appellants under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of one (1) day’s in filing the present civil restoration application. 2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the application bearing No.1897/2024 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay, same is allowed and the delay of one (1) days’ in filing the present civil restoration application is condoned. 3. The present restoration application has been filed by the applicants/appellants for restoration of S.B. civil Misc. Appeal No.4344/2019, which was dismissed vide order dated 05.07.2024 in furtherance of peremptory order dated 04.09.2023 for want of waiving the defects. 4. Heard. 5. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the applicants/appellants. 6. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants/appellants and for the reasons mentioned in the present restoration application, same is allowed and S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No.4344/2019 is ordered to be restored at its original number and position. 7. Accordingly, present restoration application stands allowed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /37