212 GENERAL MANAGER, THE PRESIDING OFFICER AND ORS. CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) interim order, the award 27.10.1997 (Annexure P complied retired even after serving again hence, the present petition ma disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive in case, any issue survives in the present petition as of now. 31-07-2025 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-209 Date of Decision : 31 ENERAL MANAGER, HARYANA ROADWAYS, VERSUS THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Saurabh Girdhar, AAG Haryana For the petitioner. Mr. B.R Rana, Advocate for respondent No.2. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as there was no interim order, the award 27.10.1997 (Annexure P complied in the last 24 years and the respondent retired even after serving again hence, the present petition ma disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive in case, any issue survives in the present petition as of now. Ordered accordingly. Pending application, if any, also stand 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 209-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision : 31-07-2025 HARYANA ROADWAYS, FARIDABAD ........Petitioner VERSUS , LABOUR COURT-II, FARIDABAD ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Saurabh Girdhar, AAG Haryana HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) ed counsel for the petitioner submits that as there was no interim order, the award 27.10.1997 (Annexure P-3) must have been years and the respondent-Workman might have retired even after serving again hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive in case, any issue survives in the present petition as of now. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE : YES NO ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ed counsel for the petitioner submits that as there was no 3) must have been Workman might have y kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to revive in (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.31 18:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document