Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28102 (ALL)

RAM MILAN CHANDRAMA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/7016/2025 · 2025-03-09

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34535 Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7016 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Milan Chandrama Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Om Sharan Tiwari,Shrikant Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rameshwar Prasad Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: "1. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing the respondent no. 4/Tehsildar, Tehsil Mehnagar, District- Azamgarh to decide the Case No. 902 of 2024, Computerized Case No.T202415060500902 (Report Versus Lal Bihari) U/s 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending before him, within stipulated period of time as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner is neither a party to the aforesaid proceedings nor a person aggrieved, therefore, the writ petition at his behest is not maintainable. 4. However, this Court has no information as to pendency of the cases of similar nature before the court concerned, therefore, no direction can be given for time bound disposal of the aforesaid proceedings. 5. Since the proceedings are pending, it is expected that the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law after hearing all the parties. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 10.3.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad