SURENDRA PRASAD GUPTA AND 3 ORS v. PRITAM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS
Cont.Cas(C)/329/2020 · 2025-11-25
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28097 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28097 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010099162020
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/329/2020 SURENDRA PRASAD GUPTA AND 3 ORS S/O- LT. BINDHYACHAL PRASAD GUPTA, R/O- N.S.C.B. HOJAI, WARD NO.
13, P.S. HOJAI, DIST.- HOJAI, ASSAM 2: ANUP MUKHERJEE S/O- LT. AMARENDRA NATH MUKHERJEE R/O- NORTH LUMDING LAANKA ROAD P.O. AND P.S. LUMDING DIST.- HOJAI ASSAM 3: DULAL CHANDRA DAS S/O- LT. BHUBAN CHANDRA DAS R/O- VILL- HIRA BASTI P.O. BORBOHA P.S. AND DIST.- HOJAI ASSAM 4: BISWAJIT DUTTA S/O- LT. HARIPADA DUTTA R/O- GOBINDAPALLY WARD NO. 6 HOJAI TOWN P.O.
P.S. AND DIST.- HOJA ASSA VERSUS PRITAM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (SECONDARY) DEPTT. (SECONDARY), SACHIVALAYA, DISPUR, GHY-06, ASSAM
Page No.# 2/3 2:PHANINDRA JIDUNG DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY-19 ASSAM 3:POBIN SARMAH THE INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS NAGAON DISTRICT CIRCLE NAGAON ASSAM 4:SAMIR SINHA THE COMMISSIONER FINANCE (BUDGET) SACHIVALAYA DISPUR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P J SAIKIA, MR. R S MISHRA,MR. P BORDOLOI Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R1), MS N M SARMA,MR. R MAZUMDAR,MS.
N PHUKAN (R1),MR S M T CHISTIE (R1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER 26.11.2025 Heard Ms. M Kechi, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri PJ Saikia,
learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Shri SMT Chistie, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3. This petition was instituted alleging deliberate and willful violation of the order of this Court dated 28.08.2019 passed in WP(C)/5884/2016. Ms. Kechi, learned counsel for the petitioners has, however, informed that during the pendency of this petition, the aforesaid order in question has been complied with.
Page No.# 3/3 In view of the aforesaid development, this Court is of the opinion that there is no requirement to continue with this proceeding any further which accordingly stands closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant