IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 667 CWP-1353-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.04.2025 Urmil Bhardwaj and others ...Petitioners Versus The Principal Secy. to Govt. of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present: None for the petitioners. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Prayer made in the present case for quashing the proviso vide which clause in 2001 Rules had been added for promotion to the post of Superintendent Grade I from the post of Research Assistant, might not, due to efflux of time, even be surviving. 2. Disposed of, reserving the petitioners with a liberty to get it revived, in case lis still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 08.04.2025 Hemant Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No HAMANT 2025.04.08 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document