Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28095 (AP)

N.Venkatesh v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal

WP/27113/2013 · 2025-06-26

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010398812013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27113/2013 Between: 1. N.VENKATESH, S/O NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O PONNAKALVA, TIRUCHANUR POST, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, URDU GALLI, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR A P STATE HOUSING CORPORATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 5. THE INAMS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondents authorities in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his lawful possession in respect of the land land in Sy.No. 437/5 and 437/6, admeasuring Ac. 0-94 cents and Ac. 0.39 cents situated at Tiruchanuru village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, without following the due process of Law, as being illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the above said land, and to grant IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 33576 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents herein not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of land in Sy.No. 437/5 and 437/6, admeasuring Ac. 0-94 cents and Ac. 0.39 cents situated at Tiruchanuru village, Tirupathi Rural Mandal, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass IA NO: 4 OF 2013(WPMP 149400 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHILAMKURI HANUMANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHY R 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC) 4. GP FOR HOUSING The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 25.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 27.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27113 of 2013 Date: 27.06.2025 IKN