[2025:RJ-JP:34362] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12524/2025 Jyoti Kiran Stone Crusher Falioa, Through Its Proprietor Chail Behari Nagar, Son Of Shri Jagdish Prasad Nagar, Aged About 58 Years, Resident Of Village Badora, Tehsil Atru, District Baran. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Mines And Geology Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Mines And Geology Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Udaipur. 3. Additional Director, Mines And Geology Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Kota. 4. Assistant Mining Engineer, Mines And Geology Department, 101 And 102, Mini Secretariat, Naveen Vistar, Collectorate Compound, Baran. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha, Addl. GC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/08/2025 1. Aggrieved by the order dated 26.08.2021 passed by the Assistant Mining Engineer, Mines & Geology Department, an appeal was preferred by the petitioner before the Additional Director, Mines & Geology Department, however, the same was rejected vide order dated 24.08.2023 against which a revision petition has been submitted before Revisional Authority. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the next date before the Revisional Authority is 24.09.2025 and in the [2025:RJ-JP:34362] (2 of 2) [CW-12524/2025] meantime, the respondents have attached the properties of the petitioner and now they are going to auction the same and an attachment order has been passed, in this regard, on 24.07.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that until revision petition is decided by the Revisional Authority, the Department be restrained to not to auction the properties of the petitioner. 4. On asking by this Court, Mr. Rahul Lodha, Addl. GC has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. 5. Looking to the fact that against the impugned order dated 24.08.2023, a revision petition is pending before Revisional Authority, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition by issuing directions to the Revisional Authority to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending revision petition on the next date and if it is not possible then by fixing a short date of seven days. 6. For a period of three weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. 7. Needless to observe, in case, any adverse order is passed against the petitioner, he would be at liberty to approach appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievances. 8. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/36